80 year old male CC: Chest pain – Conclusion

This is Part II of the conclusion to 80 year old male CC: Chest pain. For Part I see Excessive discordance as a marker of acute STEMI in LBBB.

First, let's take another look at the initial 12-lead ECG.

The first thing that catches my eye in this ECG is the strange morphology of the ST-segments and T-waves in the inferior leads (and lead aVL).

Could these be reciprocal changes to an acute anterior STEMI?

This ECG easily meets Sgarbossa's criterion of discordant ST-elevation > 5 mm, but is the ST-elevation excessively discordant when taking into account the depth of the S-wave?

Let's apply Dr. Smith's decision rule (that we learned about in the previous post). Do we see "excessive discordance" in this ECG?


If this isn't evidence enough there are also significant changes in QRS voltage and ST/T morphology between the first and last 12-lead ECG.

Diagnosis: Acute anterior STEMI in the presence of LBBB.

See also:

80 year old male CC: Chest pain

Excessive discordance as a marker of acute STEMI in LBBB

Discordant ST-segment elevation in LBBB or paced rhythm

62 year old male CC: Chest pain

58 year old female CC: Chest pain

New left bundle branch block is a poor predictor of coronary occlusion (Dr. Smith's ECG Blog)


  • Christopher says:

    I guess I was most surprised that II/III/aVF/I/aVL were “discordant”. I’d always been looking for concordance with the terminal deflection. Perhaps a terminology change, “principle deflection”?

  • Tom B says:

    I don’t know, Christopher. The inferior leads in this case don’t follow the usual morphology for LBBB. Usually the “principle deflection” is the terminal deflection for LBBB (and of course you definitely use terminal deflection for RBBB). Dr. Smith (and others) use the main deflection when determining discordance or concordance. However, Tomas Garcia, M.D. uses terminal deflection and reportedly even asked Elena Sgarbossa, M.D. about it at a medical conference. In this case it wasn’t critical for the diagnosis, so I’m just going to make a mental note of the problem.


  • Hillis says:

    I didn’t get it well !! does it mean to maesure the ST/QRS ratio in all precordial leads or in specific leads to say at the end it’s STEMI in the presence of LBBB !! and is this correct even in the setting of Left ventricualr hypertrophy ?
    The second point it is not true that STD in the inferior leads represent reciprocal to lateral STE until proven othrewise . Don’t you notice STE in aVL ?

  • Hillis says:

    PS ! the more deep S wave the more elevated ST segment this feature is not normal for LVH !! which is seen in this case .

  • Christopher says:

    Tom, I went back to Chou’s for some soul searching and found it describes it differently:

    - In LBBB with a prominent R wave, you’re looking for a negative T wave
    - In LBBB with a prominent S wave, you’re looking for a positive T wave

    Chou’s does not remark on the terminal deflection in the section on LBBB.

  • Brandon O says:

    I thought the changes from first to last ECG were very interesting and subtle. The only obvious red flag supporting MI, to me, is a slight (~1 box) fattening of the T waves.

  • Tom B says:

    I am aware of what Chou says. However, it’s not that simple, IMHO. I’ve seen too many cases where an Rs complex showed a positive T-wave in the setting of LBBB. Keep in mind, T-wave changes are non-specific. What really matters is the ST-segment. When you have an equiphasic QRS complex, or even one where the R-wave is taller than the S-wave is deep, in my experience the T-wave can be positive, flat, biphasic, or negative, but the ST-segment is isoelectric (or very close to isoelectric). I still think there’s a ST/T wave abnormality in the inferior leads for this case but you’d have to have an “old” ECG for comparison to appreciate it.


  • Tom B says:

    Take this ECG as an example:


    Would you call the relationship between the QRS complex and T-wave abnormal in lead V6?


  • Brandon O says:

    IMO the example you give is clearer when you consider the context of V6; watching the S-wave progress through the other precordials makes it clear which deflection is the relevant one, despite the sudden appearance of that substantial R-wave.

    Regarding the T-waves, can’t we just say that concordant T-waves are non-specific and not nearly as troubling as concordant ST changes — but are nevertheless somewhat suggestive of an ischemic event? If we limit our radar to only the most knock-down findings, we’d have to ignore an awful lot of the ECG!

  • Tom B says:

    You’re right, Brandon. In this context V6 is essentially a transition lead. I also agree we can say that concordant T-waves are nonspecific whereas concordant ST-segments are diagnostic. Provided of course that they are clearly concordant. Take lead aVL for example. It looks “wrong” because the T-wave is concordant with the terminal deflection but it’s discordant from the main deflection (unusual for LBBB). So what’s next? I fall back on Tomas Garcia M.D.’s advice. “Consider the company it keeps.”


  • Brandon O says:

    Agreed. It’s good and right to try to “drill down” into every indicator we can, but life being what it is, many times the best we can do still leaves ambiguity. That’s the value of having a whole host of other findings to guide the way; it’s only when they’re ALL ambiguous that you’re in trouble :-)

  • Christopher says:

    Tom, interesting ECG. I think I’d likely to ignore those sorts of changes in isolation, especially in V6. But what struck me in the original ECG was that all of the limb leads had such “odd” ST segments. I’m quite interested in this difference! Although from what I have read up, you’re on point that in LBBB the T wave changes can be almost any combination. If I had read a bit further in Chou’s it notes that if there is a dominant R in I/aVL/V5/V6 often times you have a positive T-wave without an ischemic origin. It also notes that the repolarization abnormalities may soften the amplitude which may visually produce these discontinuities. Considering the company it keeps, I often think of potassium problems when I see odd ECG morphologies with a block!

  • malcolm x says:

    you guys over-analyze unnecessarily. you make so much hoopla over basic diagnosis lol.

  • malcolm x says:

    especially TOM B. he says so much crap

  • You sound like a real Fulbright scholar, Malcolm X. Since identifying acute STEMI in the presence of LBBB is so “basic” maybe you could educate us so we can avoid all the hoopla (crap). Astonish us.

  • malcolm x says:

    lol do what you do TOM B. get your grandiose on

  • malcolm x says:

    seriously though TOM B i am just busting your chops. i am having a bad day as you can tell and i was hoping to transfer it to someone else. anyway so TOM, would you happen to have any material or video on holter analysis ? you think you can help me out here ?

  • J says:

    I find this site and the discussion it generates to be hugely helpful and informative. Maclom X I think your comments are really rude and you should think more carefully before deciding to attempt to transfer a bad day to people who put so much effort into trying to inform and improve prehospital care.

5 Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

EMS 12-Lead

Cardiac Rhythm Analysis, 12-Lead ECG Interpretation, Resuscitation

JEMS Talk: Google Hangout

53 year old male with a suspicious ECG
1st degree AV block. Left Anterior Hemiblock (rS waves in II, III and aVF, Left Axis Deviation -45 degrees QRS < 0.12). ST-changes I and aVL (concave rather than convex but suggestive of possible high lateral injury). Requires cardiologist referral.
2015-03-05 12:52:44
William Dillon
60 year old male CC: Sudden cardiac arrest
Great case but it stopped short. It should continue. The patient was transferred to an experienced PCI center. Focused medical evaluation was performed in the ED and emergent cardiology consultation was obtained. Although there is not clear ST elevation on the 12 lead the interventional cardiologist knows the data that over 70% of VF cardiac…
2015-03-03 12:53:20
Sharon Sinclair
The 12 Leads of Christmas: V3
As a technician, I absolutely love how comprehensive these posts are. Although I do not have the advanced knowledge or understanding of a licensed provider, I try to absorb as much as I can from posts like these. Maybe one day I will muster the courage to transition to a more advanced position in cardiac…
2015-02-28 20:40:17
A visit to Johns Hopkins #EMSToday2015 | EMS 12 Lead
Episode #11 – Are we harming patients with oxygen?
[…] might remember Mike from one of our most popular EMS 12-Lead podcasts Episode #11: Are we harming patients with oxygen?¬†We finished up the night with food and adult beverages in the […]
2015-02-25 14:33:03
The Trouble with Sinus Tachycardia
Had a pt today with a rate @ and around 160, it was indeed sinus tachycardia. The tachycardia was secondary to a stimulant which caused over stimulation of sympathetic nervous system ie sympathomimetic O.D. The treatment was fluid and a benzo. Problem solved.
2015-02-25 00:14:18

STEMI Expert?

  • Click here to find out!
  • 12-Lead ECG Challenge Smartphone App


    12-Lead ECG Challenge Smartphone App - $5.99

  • Apple iOS
  • Android
  • Amazon
  • Web Based

  • FRN-TV video review
  • iMedicalApps.com review
  • Interested in resuscitation?

    FireEMS Blogs eNewsletter

    Sign-up to receive our free monthly eNewsletter

    Visitor Map / Stats

    Locations of visitors to this page