Excessive discordance as a marker of acute STEMI in LBBB

This is Part I of the conclusion to 80 year old male CC: Chest pain.

Let’s take another look at the 12-lead ECG.

As we have discussed on numerous previous occasions, the expected relationship between the QRS complex and the ST-segment and T-wave in the setting of left bundle branch should be one of discordance.

This is sometimes referred to as the rule of appropriate T-wave discordance.

That means that in the setting of left bundle branch block, negatively deflected QRS complexes can be expected to show ST-elevation and upright T-waves.

Positively deflected QRS complexes can be expected to show ST-depression and inverted T-waves.

That’s why left bundle branch block is an anterior STEMI mimic.

It is normal for the ST-segments to be deflected opposite the S-waves in the right precordial leads (V1-V3).

However, there is a limit to how much discordance is appropriate.

Sgarbossa’s criteria requires at least 5 mm of discordant ST-elevation in order to be significant.

However, this criterion is problematic because it does not take into account the rule of proportionality.

That’s why it’s the weakest of Sgarbossa’s critiera.

Discordant ST-elevation of 5 mm (as a stand-alone finding) only indicates a 50% probability of AMI according to Sgarbossa’s original scoring algorithm.

 

This ECG from a previous case post demonstrates the dilemma.

 

The ST-elevation in leads V1-V3 is well over 5 mm but the S-waves are so deep that they are running off the bottom of the ECG paper.

This patient was not experiencing acute STEMI.

Stephen Smith, M.D. (of Dr. Smith’s ECG Blog) uses a modified criterion which considers the ST/QRS ratio.

He has found that when the ST-segment is deviated more than 0.2 the QRS complex it is both a sensitive and specific marker for acute STEMI in the setting of left bundle branch block (and probably also paced rhythm).

(Note: This has since been revised to 0.25 the QRS (download PDF here). However, I still think it terms of allowing 1 mm of ST-elevation for every 5 mm of S-wave depth. When I do this, I round up. In other words, if the S-wave is 18 mm deep, I round up to 20, which means that I would allow up to 4 mm of ST-elevation in that lead.)

Let’s examine each of these QRS complexes separately.

We’ll start with the positively deflected QRS complex marked ‘A’.

As you can see, the R-wave measures 10 mm. The J-point (relative to the PR segment) is depressed 3 mm. Therefore, the ST/QRS ratio is 0.3 (which is higher than 0.2). Hence, this finding would strongly suggest acute STEMI.

Now let’s look at the negatively deflected QRS complex marked ‘B’.

In this example the S-wave measures 10.5 mm. The J-point (relative to the PR segment) measures 3.5 mm. Therefore, the ST/QRS ratio is 0.33 (which is higher than 0.2). Hence, this finding, would strongly suggest acute STEMI.

In Part II we’ll apply Dr. Smith’s decision rule to the our recent case study.

See also:

80 year old male CC: Chest pain

80 year old male CC: Chest pain – Conclusion

Discordant ST-segment elevation in LBBB or paced rhythm

62 year old male CC: Chest pain

58 year old female CC: Chest pain

5 Comments

12 Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

EMS 12-Lead

Cardiac Rhythm Analysis, 12-Lead ECG Interpretation, Resuscitation

JEMS Talk: Google Hangout

Comments
Proficiency vs Deficiency… The Art Of Electrocardiography | EMS 12 Lead
Understanding Amiodarone
[…] on the highlighted title for an Amiodarone breakdown,¬†UNDERSTANDING AMIODARONE¬† ¬†One tool I use in these cases of bradycardia, is SPo2 monitoring. Remember, with every systole […]
2015-05-22 16:59:43
Wayne
12 Lead ECG – Lead Placement Diagrams
I have been doing EKG's for the past thirty years. It use to be that you always lay the patient in the supine position but here lately I have been told that with the patient sitting up right will not change the EKG, is this so ?
2015-05-21 17:37:37
Ivan Rios
Understanding Atropine
Hi Tony, thank you for writing. It's always a bit of a gamble to give opinion in such topics without being there, however, addressing ventilation is a must. The rate could be secondary to vagal stimulation and/or respiratory depression, but it sounds like the patient is compensating pretty well when it comes to the hemodynamic…
2015-05-21 12:55:43
Tony Correia
Understanding Atropine
Looking for an opinion. Had a pt. who was unconscious from unknown etiology, Agonal respiration = 6, SPO2 = 59, heart rate =37 sinus bradycardia, B/P = 137/80 . We ventilate the pt. approx for 2 minutes without change in status. Would you have administered atropine or continue with BVM to attempt to correct hypoxia,…
2015-05-21 12:16:26
dan
57 year old male: Chest Discomfort
I'm sorry but I don't see any flutter here. With a rate of 150 we are at the very upper limit of sinus tach. No O2 is indicated with a pulse ox of 94%, especially if you are thinking cardiac. Place in position of comfort, large bore IV, fluid bolus, ASA, nitro, capnography, complete assessment…
2015-05-14 03:50:36

ECG Medical Training

12-Lead ECG Challenge Smartphone App

Photobucket

12-Lead ECG Challenge Smartphone App - $5.99

  • Apple iOS
  • Android
  • Amazon
  • Web Based

  • FRN-TV video review
  • iMedicalApps.com review
  • Interested in resuscitation?

    FireEMS Blogs eNewsletter

    Sign-up to receive our free monthly eNewsletter

    Visitor Map / Stats

    Locations of visitors to this page


    LATEST EMS NEWS

    HOT FORUM DISCUSSIONS